Jane Street is back in the headlines for a market-structure reason that tends to widen spreads fast: a new lawsuit tied to Terraform’s 2022 collapse is alleging insider-information front-running by one of the most important quantitative trading firms. This matters right now because the allegation hits at the exact point where crypto, ETFs, and institutional execution intersect—trust in liquidity providers and the integrity of “who knew what, when” is the substrate of functioning markets.
Layer that on top of Monday’s broad risk-off session (major U.S. indexes down, bitcoin down), and you have the kind of tape where legal headlines can become catalysts, not just background noise—especially when investors are already repricing AI disruption risk across legacy software and security.
Key Takeaways:
- You’ll get a clean read on Monday’s Feb. 23, 2026 risk-off close across the S&P 500 (^GSPC), Nasdaq (^IXIC), Dow (^DJI), and bitcoin (BTC-USD), using verified closing data.
- You’ll separate what’s alleged (Terraform administrator’s claims) from what’s viral narrative (the “10 AM” Bitcoin manipulation theory), with source-backed framing.
- You’ll leave with a practical watchlist for the week: earnings dates from the verified calendar, legal/regulatory catalysts around Jane Street, and the liquidity signals that tend to move first.
Prerequisites
- You should be comfortable reading a daily close recap (index levels, ranges, single-stock movers).
- You should understand the difference between a filed complaint (allegations) and adjudicated facts.
- You should have a way to track filings/headlines in real time (your existing news terminal or alerts).
Market Overview
In the most recent completed U.S. session (Monday, Feb. 23, 2026), equities sold off across the board: the S&P 500 (^GSPC) closed at 6,837.75 (-71.76, -1.04%), the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) ended at 22,627.27 (-258.80, -1.13%), and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) finished at 48,804.06 (-821.91, -1.66%), based on the verified Yahoo Finance market data provided.
| Index (Mon, Feb. 23, 2026 close) | Close | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 (^GSPC) | 6,837.75 | -71.76 | -1.04% |
| Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) | 22,627.27 | -258.80 | -1.13% |
| Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) | 48,804.06 | -821.91 | -1.66% |
Single-stock shock was a key driver of the Dow’s underperformance: IBM (IBM) closed at $223.35, down 13.15% in the verified session data, after CNBC reported investors were reacting to AI disruption fears tied to Anthropic-related programming language headlines (CNBC). The forward signal is straightforward: when a price-weighted index like the Dow takes a hit from one mega-cap move, you should expect more index-level volatility from idiosyncratic “AI narrative gaps,” not just macro beta.
Outlook and Key Events Ahead
Economic Calendar
The immediate setup into Tuesday is headline-driven rather than data-driven in the materials provided: markets are digesting tariff policy/legal uncertainty and broader risk appetite. CNBC’s coverage highlights the post–Supreme Court tariff fallout and the political/legal scramble around next steps (CNBC), plus FedEx’s lawsuit seeking tariff refunds (CNBC). In practice, this is the kind of uncertainty that can keep implied volatility elevated even without a marquee economic print.
Actionable “tape tells” to watch early in the U.S. session:
- Does equity weakness broaden beyond the Dow? Monday’s selloff was broad, but the Dow’s -1.66% stands out. If the Nasdaq (^IXIC) leads lower again, it’s a growth de-risking signal.
- Do crypto and equities diverge? If equities stabilize while bitcoin remains heavy, that often points to crypto-specific liquidity/risk appetite tightening rather than a pure macro shock.
- Do policy headlines hit cyclicals first? Tariff uncertainty tends to filter into trade-sensitive narratives before it shows up in “slow” macro data.
Earnings Watch
This week’s earnings calendar (from the verified market data block) is packed with names that can move factor exposures even if you don’t hold them directly. Reports to keep on your screen include:
- Dominion Energy (D) — pre-market, EPS est: $0.64
- Domino’s Pizza (DPZ) — pre-market, EPS est: $5.36
- Keysight Technologies (KEYS) — after-hours, EPS est: $1.73
- ONEOK (OKE) — after-hours, EPS est: $1.50
- Diamondback Energy (FANG) — after-hours, EPS est: $1.88
- BWX Technologies (BWXT) — after-hours, EPS est: $0.91
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BMRN) — after-hours, EPS est: $0.07
- Axsome Therapeutics (AXSM) — pre-market, EPS est: ($0.70)
What matters for positioning: in a dispersion regime (big winners and big losers on the same day), earnings can create “second-order” moves in peers and ETFs. If you’re trading around results, focus on guidance language and forward demand signals—those will matter more than backward-looking beats/misses when the market is repricing narratives.
Central Bank & Policy
Policy risk remains a primary volatility input. CNBC’s stream of tariff-related coverage underscores that legal and political mechanisms can move as fast as economic data—and markets have to price that path dependency in real time (CNBC; CNBC). The practical takeaway is not to “predict policy,” but to expect higher variance in outcomes for trade-sensitive narratives until there’s clarity on what replaces the struck-down framework.
Technical Levels & Sentiment
Monday’s intraday ranges give you a clean, mechanical map for where buyers actually showed up:
- S&P 500 (^GSPC) range: 6,819.82–6,916.96; close: 6,837.75.
- Nasdaq (^IXIC) range: 22,547.12–22,893.22; close: 22,627.27.
- Dow (^DJI) range: 48,731.46–49,695.61; close: 48,804.06.
What to watch next: if early strength can’t reclaim meaningful portions of Monday’s range in ^GSPC and ^IXIC, you’re likely still in a “sell the rip” tape—especially with headline catalysts stacking up.
Risks & Catalysts (Jane Street focus)
The market-moving Jane Street development is a lawsuit tied to Terraform’s 2022 collapse. CoinDesk reports that Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator has sued high-frequency trading firm Jane Street, alleging it used insider information to front-run trades that accelerated the collapse of TerraUSD and luna (CoinDesk). CoinDesk’s write-up includes a specific allegation: a Jane Street-linked wallet withdrew 85 million TerraUSD from Curve3pool minutes after Terraform quietly pulled 150 million UST, which the complaint claims helped trigger the stablecoin’s loss of its dollar peg and a $40 billion market wipeout. CoinDesk also reports Jane Street denied the allegations as a “desperate” and “baseless” attempt to extract money.
Bloomberg also reports the administrator alleged Jane Street used “non-public information to front-run trading that hastened the collapse of Terraform,” in a complaint filed Monday in Manhattan federal court (Bloomberg).
Why this matters beyond the parties named (analysis): even without any adjudicated finding, allegations of insider-information trading can change how counterparties think about:
- Execution risk during stress windows (who steps back, who widens spreads, who demands more margin).
- Due diligence intensity for market participants interacting with major trading firms.
- Crypto market trust at a time when bitcoin is already under pressure (see BTC-USD close below).
Separately, Moneycontrol reports Jane Street continued recruiting from IIT campuses for its Hong Kong team despite ongoing regulatory proceedings, with its dispute with India’s market regulator SEBI reportedly set to be heard by the Securities Appellate Tribunal this month (Moneycontrol). That’s a business signal: talent pipelines remain active even as regulatory/legal scrutiny persists.
Finally, TradingView News summarizes a viral theory that claims Jane Street’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) holdings are linked to a daily “10 AM” bitcoin price pattern, citing figures for shares held and value in Q4 2025 (TradingView News). Treat that content as sentiment and positioning narrative, not proof of manipulation; the source itself frames it as a viral theory.
What to watch next (practitioner checklist):
- Filings and redactions: whether additional portions of the complaint become public and whether the alleged wallet/timing claims are substantiated in court records.
- Liquidity symptoms: watch for widening spreads, sharper intraday wick moves, and reduced depth in crypto during U.S. cash hours when headlines hit.
- Regulatory calendar headlines: any update on the reported SEBI/SAT hearing timing can become a broader “HFT scrutiny” catalyst.
Top Movers
| Ticker | Price (Mon, Feb. 23 close) | Change % | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACLX (ACLX) | $113.75 | +77.43% | Top gainer in the verified session data, reflecting extreme single-name dispersion. |
| IBRX (IBRX) | $9.83 | +12.99% | Strong upside move; also appeared on the verified “most active” list. |
| VRE (VRE) | $18.81 | +12.16% | Outperformed sharply in a down tape; also listed as “most active” in verified data. |
| VKTX (VKTX) | $34.46 | +11.05% | High-beta upside while indexes fell; also “most active” in verified data. |
| USAR (USAR) | $18.79 | +9.05% | Advanced despite broad index weakness; also “most active” in verified data. |
| IBM (IBM) | $223.35 | -13.15% | Sold off sharply as AI disruption fears hit legacy enterprise software narratives (CNBC). |
| V (V) | $306.52 | -4.50% | Large-cap weakness in a risk-off session; also “most active” in verified data. |
| UBER (UBER) | $70.72 | -4.25% | Fell even as CNBC reported Uber is acquiring SpotHero (CNBC). |
| HIMS (HIMS) | $15.51 | -0.77% | Modest decline; still among the most active names in verified data. |
The forward-looking read: Monday wasn’t “everything down.” It was a high-dispersion session—ACLX (ACLX) up 77.43% while IBM (IBM) dropped 13.15%—which is exactly when execution quality, liquidity conditions, and headline timing matter more than broad market beta.
Sector Performance
Monday’s session was dominated by narrative repricing more than clean sector rotation:
- AI disruption repricing hit legacy enterprise software narratives, with IBM (IBM) the clearest single-stock example per CNBC’s reporting (CNBC).
- Cybersecurity “AI victim” framing added pressure to software sentiment, with CNBC highlighting cybersecurity stocks selling off amid new AI tool–driven disruption fears (CNBC; CNBC).
- Crypto risk-off stayed in the mix: BTC-USD closed Monday at 63,134.96 (-2.29%), and CNBC reported bitcoin extended its decline on Tuesday, falling below $63,000 as investors grappled with tariff tensions and geopolitical risks (CNBC).
What to watch next: if the “AI eats software” fear broadens, it can compress multiples across adjacent software categories quickly—feeding back into Nasdaq (^IXIC) factor de-risking even if the macro backdrop is unchanged.
Macroeconomic Developments
The macro impulse in the provided sources is less about one scheduled release and more about financial-conditions narratives and policy uncertainty:
- Tariffs and legal uncertainty: CNBC reports Congress is contemplating its role on tariffs after a Supreme Court decision (CNBC), while FedEx is suing for tariff refunds after the ruling (CNBC).
- Private credit stress narrative: CNBC describes private credit’s rise to roughly $3 trillion and how stress signals are spreading (CNBC).
- Rates and housing sensitivity: CNBC reports mortgage rates dropped below 6%, matching the lowest level since 2022 (CNBC).
The forward tell: if equities keep sliding while “rates down” housing headlines persist, the market is more likely interpreting easing rates as a growth worry than a clean risk-on tailwind.
Commodities and Global Markets
Cross-asset signals at Monday’s verified close were mixed:
- Gold (GC=F) closed at 5,196.80/oz (-0.15%).
- WTI crude (CL=F) closed at $66.50/bbl (+0.29%).
- Bitcoin (BTC-USD) closed at 63,134.96 (-2.29%).
That blend—gold roughly flat, oil slightly higher, bitcoin down sharply—leans toward a liquidity/risk appetite hit that’s more acute in crypto than in traditional inflation hedges. What to watch next is whether BTC weakness continues to lead equities (a “liquidity beta” signal) or decouples (a crypto-specific risk repricing potentially amplified by the Jane Street/Terraform legal headline).
Common Pitfalls or Pro Tips
- Pitfall: trading allegations like verdicts. The Terraform administrator’s complaint is an allegation; CoinDesk reports Jane Street denied it as “desperate” and “baseless” (CoinDesk). Your edge is trading the uncertainty (volatility, liquidity conditions), not assuming an outcome.
- Pitfall: treating viral manipulation theories as evidence. TradingView News explicitly frames the IBIT/“10 AM” claim as a viral theory (TradingView News). Use it as a sentiment gauge, not a market microstructure model.
- Pro tip: use dispersion as your regime flag. A day with ACLX (ACLX) +77.43% and IBM (IBM) -13.15% while indexes fall is a dispersion regime. In that regime, sizing, liquidity, and entry timing dominate “directional genius.”
- Pro tip: don’t confuse “AI disruption” with “AI capex.” In the same news cycle, CNBC can highlight AI disruption fears in software and also report Amazon plans to spend $12 billion in Louisiana on AI data centers (CNBC). Those are different exposures with different winners and losers.
Conclusion
The Jane Street/Terraform lawsuit headline is landing in a market that already de-risked on Monday, which is exactly when trust and liquidity narratives can move prices faster than fundamentals. Your near-term edge is to track what becomes provable in filings, watch crypto liquidity conditions, and use Monday’s index ranges as your simple map for whether sellers still control the tape.
For the week ahead, keep your checklist tight: BTC-USD behavior versus ^IXIC, earnings-driven dispersion (KEYS, D, DPZ, OKE, FANG), and any incremental legal/regulatory headlines that can shift how counterparties price execution risk.

